Re: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect

To: Josh Richards <jrichard@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect
From: John Fraizer <nanog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 17:55:01 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: nanog@xxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: zerbey@geron2us.wibble.co.uk
Delivered-to: nanog-outgoing@trapdoor.merit.edu
Delivered-to: nanog@trapdoor.merit.edu
Delivered-to: nanog@merit.edu
In-reply-to: <20010911090555.A7069@cubicle.net>
Sender: owner-nanog@xxxxxxxxx


Directly.

On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Josh Richards wrote:

> 
> * Seth M. Kusiak <seth.kusiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [20010911 08:52]:
> > 
> > |Additionally, FBI flash-traffic is indicating a threat of virus attack in 
> > conjunction.
> > 
> > A chemical virus? 
> 
> Where are you hearing about FBI flash-traffic?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -jr
> 
> ----
> Josh Richards <jrichard@{ geekresearch.com, cubicle.net }> [JTR38/JR539-ARIN]
> Geek Research, LLC - San Luis Obispo, CA - <URL:http://www.geekresearch.com/>
> KG6CYK - IP/Unix/telecom/knowledge/coffee/security/crypto/business/geek
> 


---
John Fraizer
EnterZone, Inc

References:
- Re: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect
  - From: Josh Richards

Prev by Date: RE: World Trade Center attack
Next by Date: Re: Verizon COs affected by WTC damage?
Previous by thread: Re: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect
Next by thread: Re: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread