Re: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof

To: Vadim Antonov <avg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof
From: Dan Hollis <goemon@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 00:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: <nanog@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: zerbey@geron2us.wibble.co.uk
Delivered-to: nanog-outgoing@trapdoor.merit.edu
Delivered-to: nanog@trapdoor.merit.edu
Delivered-to: nanog@merit.edu
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10109112117080.14821-100000@arch.exigengroup.com>
Sender: owner-nanog@xxxxxxxxx

On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Vadim Antonov wrote:
> Locked bulletproof door to the cockpit. Survelliance cameras in the
> passenger compartments.  That all which was needed to foil the attack. Now
> I think it's time to ask why this isn't the standard procedure?

Or they could just fly plainclothes armed marshals on US flights.

Apparently they tried this years ago, but stopped because it was
"uneconomical". I guess the airlines have figured out how to put a dollar
amount on human lives.

-Dan

-- 
[-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof
  - From: Scott A Crosby

References:
- Re: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof
  - From: Vadim Antonov

Prev by Date: Recovery > It will take years...
Next by Date: Re: Additional Power Outages in Lower Manhattan
Previous by thread: Re: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof
Next by thread: Re: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread