|
Save the teapot fund New CSS web design for Wibble proudly provided by Kelv. Please contact the webmaster with any questions or concerns. |
Wibble > List archives > nanog > 2001 [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof
That's what the National Guard and FBI are for. FBI has plenty of scary military-types to do exactly the same function as a military-scary-type. Deepak -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-nanog@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Ron Buchalski Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 3:35 AM To: deepak@xxxxxx; nanog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: doshea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; toasty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; DaveHowe@xxxxxxxxx; nanog@xxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof During an interview this evening on NBC, Tom Brokaw asked Donald Rumsfeld (Sec. of Defense) whether the US Military would be willing to provide security personnel on commercial jets. He responded that US Military personnel are trained for war, not to be security or police, and would not be deployed as security for commercial airlines. -rb >From: "Deepak Jain" <deepak@xxxxxx> >Subject: RE: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof >Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 16:53:14 -0400 > > > >I'm inclined to agree. Especially if the Marine is specifically trained for >air-terrorism scenarios, but I can't imagine that is the solution we as a >country will adopt. > >Deepak _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
|