Re: nanog-l listserv lag

To: nanog@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: nanog-l listserv lag
From: Peter van Dijk <peter@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 02:24:01 +0200
Delivered-to: zerbey@geron2us.wibble.co.uk
Delivered-to: nanog-outgoing@trapdoor.merit.edu
Delivered-to: nanog@trapdoor.merit.edu
Delivered-to: nanog@merit.edu
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0109130048000.3376-100000@uplift.swm.pp.se>; from swmike@swm.pp.se on Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 12:49:26AM +0200
Mail-followup-to: nanog@xxxxxxxxx
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0109130048000.3376-100000@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Sender: owner-nanog@xxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 12:49:26AM +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> 
> 
> I find this 1h35m lag on nanog-l to be quite in the way of quickly
> spreading news. Any chance of getting the list servers a bit more
> efficient?

I can offer efficient mailinglist hosting as well, if anybody is
interested :)

(this is not spam, I'm not allowed to ask money for anything I offer
:)

Greetz, Peter
-- 
Monopoly        http://www.dataloss.nl/monopoly.html

References:
- nanog-l listserv lag
  - From: Mikael Abrahamsson

Prev by Date: Re: Reducing power consumption in generator-supplied facilities
Next by Date: Re: 32 Old Slip AC Outage and 60 Hudson Verizon failure
Previous by thread: nanog-l listserv lag
Next by thread: Not all Men In Black work for the Government (was Re: Carnivore)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread