Re: [greylisting] SQLgrey

[Tony Earnshaw <tonye@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

søn, 03.10.2004 kl. 03.15 skrev Robin Lynn Frank:

> On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 01:49:23 +0200
> Lionel Bouton <lionel-subscription@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Do gld users see benefits from using lightgrey ?
> 
> If you receive a lot of mail from "server farms" with a bunch of MXes
> such as google's newsalerts, it can save time in whitelisting since they
> usually are in the same /24.

>From a fellow gld aficionado: also all hotmail and msn shit? Whitelist
(gld has no CIDR possibility at the moment) 65.54?

>   However, when I encounter such a thing, I
> try to whitelist them all without resorting to lightgrey. 
> Lightgreydomain dumbs things down too much and I likely will never use
> it.  YMMV.

I agree!

--Tonni

-- 
«Livet er ein gamp», sa øyken.
I can confirm this.

mail: tonye@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.billy.demon.nl

They love us, don't they, They feed us, won't they