Re: anti-UCE efficacy of smtpd_helo_required

To: postfix-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: anti-UCE efficacy of smtpd_helo_required
From: Ralf Hildebrandt <Ralf.Hildebrandt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 09:51:33 +0200
Delivered-to: zerbey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: postfix-users-outgoing@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: postfix-users@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0410012155490.3986@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <http://www.postfix.org/lists.html>
List-post: <mailto:postfix-users@postfix.org>
List-subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postfix.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postfix.org>
Mail-followup-to: postfix-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <200410011929.21881.rob0@xxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0410012155490.3986@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: postfix-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-postfix-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i

* Rob Foehl <rwf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> Just use it.  It probably won't catch much spam, but it's even less likely 
> to stop anything legitimate.

Yep, that's what I'm seeing here, too

-- 
Ralf Hildebrandt                                 Ralf.Hildebrandt@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.arschkrebs.de/postfix/                Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
#!/bin/sh
cat <<EOF | dc -e "[lila/sulila%Plusili0<y]sy?si256salyx"
403736150440747681954588245935305944858835839713675044439128476844672\
007875165788798502153167817380873133828163530564
EOF

References:
- anti-UCE efficacy of smtpd_helo_required
  - From: /dev/rob0
- Re: anti-UCE efficacy of smtpd_helo_required
  - From: Rob Foehl

Prev by Date: Newbie here
Next by Date: postfix/qmgr[xxx]: xxx: to=<xxx>, relay=none, delay=xxx, status=deferred (delivery temporarily suspended: transport is unavailable)
Previous by thread: Re: anti-UCE efficacy of smtpd_helo_required
Next by thread: Newbie here
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread