Re: anti-UCE efficacy of smtpd_helo_required

[/dev/rob0 <rob0@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Friday 01 October 2004 21:01, Rob Foehl wrote:
> > smtpd_helo_required? Or should I stop worrying and learn to love
> > the smtpd_helo_required?
>
> Just use it.  It probably won't catch much spam, but it's even less
> likely to stop anything legitimate.

Advice from the loonybin! I'll take it. Thanks, Rob.

FWIW (re: anti-UCE) I've been watching, and sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org is 
doing a fantastic job. Many thanks to the spamhaus and CBL and 
Blitzed.org people. Still some spam is getting through, but the 
customer is delighted with the improvement.
-- 
    mail to this address is discarded unless "/dev/rob0"
    or "not-spam" is in Subject: header