Re: [OT] Dns servers

To: Matt <math@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, postfix <postfix-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [OT] Dns servers
From: Bennett Todd <bet@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 07:00:46 +0000
Delivered-to: zerbey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: postfix-users-outgoing@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: postfix-users@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050101015903.GG14182@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <http://www.postfix.org/lists.html>
List-post: <mailto:postfix-users@postfix.org>
List-subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postfix.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postfix.org>
References: <20041231194114.A46DF6BF02D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050101015903.GG14182@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-postfix-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i

2005-01-01T01:59:03 Craig Sanders:
> ps: some people may suggest djbdns.  avoid it like the plague.  his dns
> software only implements those parts of the DNS standards that he likes.

Errh, make that, the parts of the DNS standards that people use.

Any software that actually implemented the protocol specified by the
RFCs would be catastrophically doomed. Even BIND doesn't do anything
that dumb.

djbdns implements a useful and safe subset, correctly.

-Bennett

Attachment: pgp0lMudzMP2C.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [OT] Dns servers
  - From: Craig Sanders

Next by Date: alias_database using ldap with kerberos authentication
Next by thread: Re: [OT] Dns servers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread