Re: Virtual "catch all" problem

[Magnus Bäck <magnus@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Saturday, January 01, 2005 at 13:31 CET,
     jb-mlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> When I specify an catchall address @example.com in the alias lookups
> it works. But then no mail will go to the a virtual mailboxes for
> example.com.
> Virtual aliases has more priority then a virtual mailbox.

Correct.

> According to the documentation I can add an catchall in virtual
> mailbox tabl. But the catchall for @example.com is not located
> on the same system so I can't add an catchall address in virtual
> mailbox table.

For each valid virtual mailbox user, you need an identity mapping in the
virtual table to stop the recursion.

validuser1@xxxxxxxxxxx          validuser1@xxxxxxxxxxx
validuser2@xxxxxxxxxxx          validuser2@xxxxxxxxxxx
...
validusern@xxxxxxxxxxx          validusern@xxxxxxxxxxx
@example.com                    jim

[...]

-- 
Magnus Bäck
magnus@xxxxxxxxxxx