Re: Virtual "catch all" problem

To: postfix-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Virtual "catch all" problem
From: Magnus Bäck <magnus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 14:01:33 +0100
Delivered-to: zerbey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: postfix-users-outgoing@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: postfix-users@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0501011350170.3341@eclipse>
List-help: <http://www.postfix.org/lists.html>
List-post: <mailto:postfix-users@postfix.org>
List-subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postfix.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postfix.org>
Mail-followup-to: postfix-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0501011325120.3341@eclipse> <20050101124802.GU11382@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0501011350170.3341@eclipse>
Reply-to: postfix-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-postfix-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Saturday, January 01, 2005 at 13:51 CET,
     jb-mlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> On Sat, 1 Jan 2005, Magnus Bäck wrote:
> 
>  > For each valid virtual mailbox user, you need an identity mapping
>  > in the virtual table to stop the recursion.
>  >
>  > validuser1@xxxxxxxxxxx          validuser1@xxxxxxxxxxx
>  > validuser2@xxxxxxxxxxx          validuser2@xxxxxxxxxxx
>  > ...
>  > validusern@xxxxxxxxxxx          validusern@xxxxxxxxxxx
>  > @example.com                    jim
> 
> In the virtual alias mapping?

Yes.

-- 
Magnus Bäck
magnus@xxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- Virtual "catch all" problem
  - From: jb-mlist
- Re: Virtual "catch all" problem
  - From: Magnus Bäck
- Re: Virtual "catch all" problem
  - From: jb-mlist

Prev by Date: Re: Virtual "catch all" problem
Next by Date: Re: feature req: more info on TCP session for content filter and/or policy delegation server
Previous by thread: Re: Virtual "catch all" problem
Next by thread: Re: feature req: more info on TCP session for content filter and/or policy delegation server
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread