Re: feature req: more info on TCP session for content filter and/or policy delegation server

To: postfix-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: feature req: more info on TCP session for content filter and/or policy delegation server
From: adi <adi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 20:23:21 +0700 (WIT)
Delivered-to: zerbey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: postfix-users-outgoing@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: postfix-users@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050101045013.5AABDBC17F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <http://www.postfix.org/lists.html>
List-post: <mailto:postfix-users@postfix.org>
List-subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postfix.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postfix.org>
References: <02a701c4ef9d$e33dab30$ab19010a@xxxxxxxxxx> <20050101045013.5AABDBC17F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-postfix-users@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 11:50:13PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Neither source port nor destination port are relevant for
> client fingerprinting.

yes, but p0f require it to retreive data from it's
cache ...

Regards,

P.Y. Adi Prasaja

Prev by Date: Re: Virtual "catch all" problem
Next by Date: Re: [OT] Dns servers
Previous by thread: Re: Virtual "catch all" problem
Next by thread: Re: feature req: more info on TCP session for content filter and/or policy delegation server
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread